نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران

2 استاد دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران

3 دانشیار دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر، با هدف تبیین پیامدهای ارتقای فرهنگ برنامه‌ریزی درسی در دانشگاه‌ها و مؤسسات آموزش عالی انجام شد. مشارکت‌کنندگان در پژوهش حاضر، متخصصان در حوزه سیاست‌گذاری و یا دارای سوابق اجرایی در آموزش عالی و متخصصان برنامه درسی آموزش عالی بودند. با استفاده از طرح کیفی داده بنیاد و از طریق نمونه‌گیری هدفمند، اقدام به مصاحبه عمیق با 29 نفر از متخصصان و صاحب‌نظران حوزه آموزش عالی گردید. در تحقیق حاضر، با تحلیل محتوای کیفی، اطلاعات گردآوری شده ابتدا دسته‌بندی و سپس به شیوه مقوله‌بندی مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفت. به‌منظور تعیین روایی داده‌های کیفی از روش چک کردن اعضاء استفاده شده است. یافته‌ها نشان داده است که مهم‌ترین پیامدهای ارتقای فرهنگ برنامه‌ریزی درسی دربرگیرنده کارآمدی برنامه‌ریزی درسی، جلوگیری از اتلاف منابع مالی و زمانی، گسترش کار تیمی و ارتقای بهره‌وری و رشد اثربخشی عملکرد اساتید است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Consequences of Promoting the Culture of Curriculum Development in Universities and Higher Education Institutions

نویسندگان [English]

  • hosein mohsenpour Kebriya 1
  • Korosh Fathi Vajargah 2
  • Mahboobeh Arefi 3
  • Abasalt Khorasani 3

1 Correspondence Author: Ph.D. Student of Schedule of Curriculum of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

This paper aims to explain the consequences of promoting curriculum development culture at universities and Institutions of Higher Education. The participants in this research consisted of higher education authorities, policy makers and curriculum development experts, all of whom were directly or indirectly involved in higher education curriculum programs. Making use of qualitative research design and selective sampling, an in-depth interview was conducted with 29 higher education authorities and experts. Then analyzing the qualitative content, the collected data were initially classified and then relevant categories were identified. To establish the validity of the qualitative data, the method of participants checking was deployed. The results of the research indicate that the most important consequences of promoting the curriculum design culture would be found in more efficient curriculum programs, better management of financial and time resources, expansion of team work, promotion of efficiency and performance of faculty members.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Higher Education
  • the culture of curriculum development
  • consequences

Abudu, A. M. (2015). Basic School, Teachers’ perceptions about curriculum design in Ghana. Int. J. Educ. Stud, 02 (02), pp 59-69.

Arasteh, H. (2003). The Role of Higher Education in Iran Prospect 2026. Rahyaft Journal, 31: 33-42. [Persian].

Azubuike, O. C&, Charity Oguzor, U. (2013). Consideration of Culture in the Development of Homeeconomics Curriculum in Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy, Vol. 3 No. 9, pp183-188.

Belting P. E. & Belting N. B. (2011). The Modern High school curriculum, cosmo publication, NewDelhi- India.

Chantal J. Gervedink Nijhuis, C. J.,   PIETERS, J. M. &  Voogt, J. M . (2013). Influence of culture on curriculum development in Ghana: an undervalued factor?. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Volume 45, 2013 - Issue 2, pp225-250.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2005), Teaching as a profession: lessons in teacher preparation and professional development, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 237-240.

Eskandari, H. (2008). Hidden Curriculum, Tehran: Nasima Publishing. [Persian].

Evers, F. & Wolstenholm, J. (2007). Integrating knowledge, skills and values into the curriculum development process at the University of Guelph- Humber, New directions for teaching & learning, 112, PP 83-91.

Fathi-vajargah, K., and Momeni Mahmoie, H. (2008). Investigating the Role of Factors Affecting the Participation of Faculty Members in the Academic Planning,Iranian Higher Education, 1 (1): 139-165. [Persian].

Foley, A. and Yildirim, N. (2011). The relationship between game design and instructional design. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2).

Gaff, J. G. (1975). Toward faculty renewal: Advances in faculty, instructional, an organizational development. San Francisco, CA: Josse-Bass.

Gao, Y., Zhang, P. P, Wen, S. F., Chen, Y. G. (2017). Challenge, opportunity and development: Influencing factors andtendencies of curriculum innovation on undergraduate nursing education in the mainland of China. Chinese Nursing Research 4, pp 113e116.

Gervedink Nijhuis, C. J., Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M. (2012). The cultural complexity of international collaboration: Conditions for sustainable curriculum development in Ghana. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 36, pp 647– 658.

Hall, G. E. & Hord, S, M, (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

Helton s. patricia (2000) Factors that influnce Higher Education Faculty involvement in curriculum and insruction. in Partial FullFillment of The Reguirements For The Degree Doctor of Philosophy. university of Virginia.

Keshtiaray N, Fathi Vajargah K, Zimitat C, Foroughi A. (2009). Designing and Accrediting an Experiential Curriculum in Medical Groups Based on Phenomenological Approach, Iranian Journal of Medical Education; 9(1): 55-66 [Persian].

Khosravi, M. (2012), Designing and validating the pattern of acceptance of curriculum innovation in Iran's higher education system, PhD thesis, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University [Persian].

Kontamara, P., Hallinger, Ph., & Jatiket, M. (2006). Scalling- up educational reform in Thailand: context, collaboration, networks and change. Planningand changing, 37 (1-2), PP5-23.

Lawton, D. (1993). Curriculum Studies and Educational Planning; Hodder and Stought on London.

Mahmud S, Bretag T. (2013). Postgraduate research students and academic integrity: ‘It's about good research training’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35 (4), PP 432-43.

Marsh, C. J. & Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Alternative approaches. Ongoing Issues. Pearson Education, Inc. 4th Ed. USA.

Mazzoli j Andrew (2000) Faculty perceptions of influnce on the curriculum in higher Education. Submitted in partial Fullfilment of reguirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy. University of South Carolina.

Nakpodia, E. D. (2010). Culture and curriculum development in Nigerian schools. African Journal of History and Culture (AJHC) Vol. 2 (1), pp. 001-009

Nault D. (2006) “Going Global: Rethinking Culture Teaching in ELT Contexts”, Language, Culture and Curriculum, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp22-32.

Nikitina, Svetlana (2006). Three strategies for interdisciplinary teaching: Contextualizing, Conceptualizing and Problem- Centering. Journal of curriculum studies, 38(3), PP 251-271.

Offorma, Ch, G. (2016). Integrating components of culture in curriculum Planning. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1) pp 1–8

Ratkulif, J (1997). Curriculum: Bachelor's Degree, Translation by Babak Nasiri, Selected Articles, Encyclopedia of Higher Education, First Counsel, Tehran: Institute of Research and Planning in Higher Education[Persian].

Saidi, F. E. (2005); It Develop a Curriculum Model for the Education of Architects within the Needs of a Changing South Africa University of Pretoria etd

Saketti, P. (2002). New Challenges of Academic Planning, Roundtable on Challenges of Higher Education in Iran, Shahid Beheshti University Press, Tehran [Persian].

Sharifian, F., Mirshah Jafari; S. E.,Sharif, S. M., and Mosapour, N. (2013). The viewpoints of curriculum and graduate students on how students participate in curriculum development, new approaches to education, V. 8, Issue 1(17): 47-88 [Persian].

Sharifian, F., Mirshah Jafari, S. E., Sharif, S. M., and Mosapour, N. (2014). Investigating the Present Status of the Participation of Managers and Employers in Higher Education Curriculum, Educational Planning Studies, Volume 3, No. 6, pp. 83-113. [Persian].

Shawer, S. F. (2017). Teacher-driven curriculum development at the classroom level: Implications for curriculum, pedagogy and teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education 63, pp 296-313

Stark, J. (1997). Program level curriculum planning, Journal Research in Higher Education. 38(1).

Toombs, W., Tierney, W. (1992). Meeting the Mandate: Renewing the College and Departmental Curriculum, Eric Digest.

Wolf, P. (2007). Curriculum Development in Higher Education: Faculty-Driven Processes and Practices. Jossey-Bass