فرخ, بتول, شاه طالبی, بدری. (1397). رابطة بین یادگیری خود راهبر، خودکارآمدی و سواد اطلاعاتی با رفتار تسهیمدانش. پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی, 15(56), 148-161. doi: 10.30486/jsre.2018.539730
بتول فرخ; بدری شاه طالبی. "رابطة بین یادگیری خود راهبر، خودکارآمدی و سواد اطلاعاتی با رفتار تسهیمدانش". پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی, 15, 56, 1397, 148-161. doi: 10.30486/jsre.2018.539730
فرخ, بتول, شاه طالبی, بدری. (1397). 'رابطة بین یادگیری خود راهبر، خودکارآمدی و سواد اطلاعاتی با رفتار تسهیمدانش', پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی, 15(56), pp. 148-161. doi: 10.30486/jsre.2018.539730
فرخ, بتول, شاه طالبی, بدری. رابطة بین یادگیری خود راهبر، خودکارآمدی و سواد اطلاعاتی با رفتار تسهیمدانش. پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی, 1397; 15(56): 148-161. doi: 10.30486/jsre.2018.539730
رابطة بین یادگیری خود راهبر، خودکارآمدی و سواد اطلاعاتی با رفتار تسهیمدانش
1دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، گروه علوم تربیتی، اصفهان، ایران
2دانشیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، گروه علوم تربیتی، اصفهان، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه بین یادگیری خودراهبر، خودکارآمدی و سواد اطلاعاتی با رفتار تسهیمدانش در بین دانش‌آموزان پسر مقطع متوسطه ناحیة دو شهر اصفهان در سال تحصیلی 94-93 به روش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی انجام شد. جامعة آماری تعداد 4995 پسران مقطع متوسطه ناحیة دو بود که از این میان با استفاده از فرمول کوکران و به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای تعداد 356 نفر انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات 4 پرسشنامة یادگیری خودراهبر Fisher,2001)) با 40 گویه، پرسشنامه خودکارآمدی (Shererr &Maddux,1982) با 17 گویه، پرسشنامة سواد اطلاعاتی با 18 گویه و پرسشنامة تسهیمدانش با 15 گویه بود که روایی صوری، محتوایی و سازه آن تأیید و پایایی آن‌ها نیز با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به دست آمد. داده‌های حاصل از پژوهش با استفاده از آمار توصیفی و استنباطی شامل ضریب همبستگی، رگرسیون گام‌به‌گام و تحلیل واریانس مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج آزمون فرضیه‌های اصلی نشان داد که بین یادگیری خودراهبر با رفتار تسهیمدانش، خودکارآمدی با رفتار تسهیمدانش و بین سواد اطلاعاتی با رفتار تسهیمدانش رابطة معناداری وجود داشت. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که بین بعد رغبت برای یادگیری، بعد خودمدیریتی و بعد خودکنترلی با رفتار تسهیمدانش رابطة معنادار وجود داشت. همچنین بین بعد میل به آغازگری رفتار از خودکارآمدی، بعد میل به گسترش تلاش برای کارآمد کردن تکلیف از خودکارآمدی، بعد مقاوم در رویارویی با موانع از خودکارآمدی با رفتار تسهیمدانش رابطة معنادار وجود داشت. نتایج رگرسیون گام‌به‌گام نشان داد ابعاد رغبت و خودمدیریتی از یادگیری خودراهبر توان پیش‌بینی رفتار تسهیمدانش را داشته است. همچنین بعد میل به گسترش تلاش برای کارآمد کردن تکلیف توان پیش‌بینی رفتار تسهیمدانش را داشته است.
The Study of The Relationship between Self Directed Learning Self Efficacy and Information Litracy on the Knowledge
نویسندگان [English]
batoul farrokh1؛ badri shahtalebi2
2-
چکیده [English]
The current study was performed with the aim of investigating the relationship between self-directed learning, self-efficacy and information literacy and knowledge sharing behaviour among male students of high school of district 2 of Isfahan in the academic year 93-94 through the descriptive approach of the correlational type. All high school male students of district 2 with the number of 4995 formed the statistical population of the current study that among them 356 people were selected to participate in the current study by the random cluster sampling method. Data collection tools in this study were 4 questionnaires of self-directed learning of Fisher et al. (2001) with 40 items, self-efficacy of Sherer and Maddux (1982) with 17 items, information literacy with 18 items and knowledge sharing with 15 items, that their validity was confirmed, and their reliability, also, was obtained 0.78, 0.90, 0.91 and 0.85, respectively, by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Obtained data from the research were analysed by using descriptive and inferential statistics including correlation coefficient, stepwise regression and analysis of variance. The test results of main theories showed that there was a significant relationship between self-directed learning and knowledge sharing behaviour, between self-efficacy and knowledge sharing behaviour and between information literacy and knowledge sharing behaviour. Also, the results showed that there was a significant relationship between the propensity for learning dimension, the self-management dimension and self-control dimension and knowledge sharing behaviour. Moreover, there was a significant relationship between the desire to behaviour starting of self-efficacy dimension, the desire to expand the effort for affecting the task of self-efficacy dimension, resistant in facing with the obstacles of self-efficacy dimension and knowledge sharing behaviour. The results of stepwise regression revealed that propensity and self-management dimensions of self-directed learning have the ability of predicting the knowledge sharing behaviour. The relationship among the propensity dimension to expand the effort for affecting the task has the ability of predicting the knowledge sharing behaviour. Among the views of respondents in all four variables based on the education base, there was no significant difference.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Self-directed learning, self-efficacy, Information literacy, Knowledge sharing behaviour
مراجع
Abdolahi.B. (2006). The role of self-efficacy in empowering employees.Tadbir.40. [Persian].
Bandura, A. (1986). Perceived self – efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychology, 28, 117 – 148. 1
Bartol, K.M. and Srivastava, A. 2002. Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of
Birkinshaw,J.,&Sheehan, T. (2002),”Managing the knowledge life cycle “,MIT Sloan Management Rewive,44(1),pp.75-83.
Brown,G(2001)”The right to learning “.rout ledge,Newyorky,pp.96-108.
Buck man RH. (2004).Knowledge shairing at Buckman Lebas.J of Business strategy, January/February.
Candy PC. (1991). Self –direction for lifelong learning;A nomprehensive guide to theory and practice.San Francisco: Jossey – Bass.
Chennamneni, Anitha., (2006).”Determinants of knowledge shairing Behaviors: Developing and Testing an Integrated Model”. (Ph.D.diss.,university of Texas).
Connelly, Catherine & E. Kevin Kelloway, 2003. Predictors of employees’ perceptions
Delak B, Bajec M. 2013.Information system due diligence data as an input for
Dyer, J. H. & Nobeoka, K. (2000) Creating and managing a highperformance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345-367.
Ferguson,S.K. (2009).Informaition Literacy and its relationship to Knowledge management: A theoretical study.
Garrison DR.Self-directed learning:toward a comprehensive model.In Adult Education Quarterly fall 1997; 48(1):18-31.
Hashemiyannejad.F. (2001). "Providing a Theoretical Framework on Critical Thinking Curriculum in Elementary School with Emphasis on Social Studies Curriculum", Doctoral dissertation, Azad University, Science and Research Branch.. [Persian].
Hey J. 2004. The Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom Chain: The Metaphorical link.
Hornstein,H, (2006),Empowerment as a way to facilitate change.
Hoseini.N.Asadi.M. (2011).Knowledge sharing and information literacy: reviewing the status of students studying at the University of Police [Persian].
Industrial Management & Data Systems. 9: 1326-1347.
Interrelationships. Business Management Dynamics, 10: 49-62.
Ipe, M. (2003),”Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework” Human Resource Development Rrview,Vol.2,No.4,pp.377-359.
Journal, 2003. p.p.294.
Junos, N. M., & Najid, N. S. A. 2011. The study of barrier factors in knowledge
Kim,D. (2011),The Effects of Knowledge Shairing on Program Performance:Infhuences on CPS Program Performance,the Virginia Polytechnic lnstitute and State University,Disertation In Public Administration and Public Affairs.available online at http://scholar. Lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02282011-180027/unrestricted/Kim_Dongshin_D_2011.pdf.
knowledge management.Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management.1:15-24.
Law, C. & Ngai, E. (2008). An empirical study of the effect of knowledge sharing and learning on farm performance. Expert system with application. Vol34, pp 2342-2349.
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, process, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information System, 20(1), 179-228.
Lee, J.N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing. Organizational capability and partnership quality on is outsourcing success. Information and management. Vol.38.No.5.PP.5323-35.
Li, Chia-Ying. (2013).”Does Self-efficacy Contribute to Knowledge Shairing and Innovation Effectiveness? Department of Business Administration, National Taichung University of Technology and Science, Taiwan, R.O.C.,cyli@nutc.edu.tw.
Liew A.2013. Data, Information, Knowledge, Intelligence, Wisdom and their
Lin, H, (2007), ”Knowledge shairing and firm innovation capabilitj: an empirical study”, International.
Lin M., Hunga SH., Chen C. fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities, Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25(4): 929-939.
Lin W. The effect of knowledge sharing model. Expert Systems with Applications 2008; 34(2): 1508-1521.
Lindsey,L.K. (2006).Knowledge Shairng barriers,in the encyclopedia of knowledge management(pages500-506)Schwartz,G.D:Idea Grouping,Uk.
Long Dick R.2006.Self –directed learning:Looking at outcomes with medical tudents.Fam Med,34(3):197-200.
Long HB.2007.Understanding self-directed in learning.In H.B.Long & Associated (Eds.),practice & theory in self- directed learning (PP1-28).san Francisco,CA:Josse-Bass.
Nadi M,Gordanshekan M,Golparvar M. Effect of Critical Thinking, Problem Solving and Meta-Cognitive on Students’Self- Iearnig Reseurch in Curriculum Planning Spring & Summer2011-Vol 8.No1,2(Continuous No.28,29).
Naeemi.L. (2012). Level of Readiness for Self-Learned Learning in Medical Students. Journal of Strategies for Education, Volume 5, Issue(3)pp. 177-181. [Persian].
Nejati.y.Jaliliyan.Gh.Badriazin.y. (2014). The Relationship between Knowledge Management and Self-efficacy in Physical Education Students of Tabriz University, Master's Thesis, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Tabriz University. [Persian].
O'Dell, C. and Grayson, C.J. 1998. If only we knew what we know: identification and
of knowledge sharing cultures. Journal: Leadership & Organization Development
organizational reward systems” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1): 64-76.
Ozbebek A. 2011. Empowered employees knowledge sharing behavior. International
Ozbebek A. 2011. Empowered employees knowledge sharing behavior. International journal of business and management studies. 2: 69-76.
Pintrich,P.,&De Groot,E. (1990).Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic.Journal of Educational Psycology,82,33-40
Rading, A. (2001). Knowledge management. translate by Latifi, M.Samt publication;1.
Raemdonck,I.,ThijssenJ.,&Valcke,M.2006.Predictors of self directedness in learning and career processes for low-qualified.
Rahnavard.F.Sadr.F. (2009) The Relationship between the Perception of the Culture of Employee Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Factors in Government Devices. Journal of Beyond management(8) [Persian].
Saleh.S.Maleki.S. (2014). Investigating the Role of Quality and Self-Efficiency of Knowledge Management System and Organizational Climate in the Process of New Services Development in Tejarat Bank, Master's Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch. [Persian].
sharing: a case study in public university. Management Science & Engineering, 5(1),59-70
Social Learning Theory. Translated by F.Maher.Tehran.Rahgosha [Persian]. Badura.A. (1992)
Tabatabaee.N. (1999). Study of the Concept of Information Literacy (Content Analysis of Articles of Publications). The Dissertation of the Book. No. 10, No. 3.. 62-93.. [Persian].
transfer of internal best practices, California Management Review, 3: 154-74.
Zawawi, A. A.; Zakaria, Z.; Kamarunzaman, N. Z.; Noordin, N.; Sawal, M. Z. H.M.; Zhang P, Fung F. 2012. Attitude toward knowledge sharing in construction teams.
ابتدای صفحه