نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه فرهنگیان، پردیس شهیدباهنر، اراک، ایران.

2 اداره آموزش‌وپرورش شهرستان دلیجان، دلیجان، ایران.

10.30486/jsre.2019.551230.

چکیده

برنامه‌ریزی درسی کلاس‌های درس چندپایه از موضوعات چالش‌برانگیز در کشورهای پیشرفته و درحال‌توسعه است. در این کشورها، برنامه‌ریزی درسی چندپایه از حیث ضرورت، کارایی و عملی بودن مورد توجه و بحث جدی قرار دارد. مقاله مروری حاضر با استفاده از منابع موجود در کتابخانة چاپی و به‌کارگیری موتور جستجوی گوگل اسکولار (google scholar) پایگاه‌های داده‌ای مثل مرکز پایان‌نامه‌های ‌ایرانی (Irandoc)، جهاد دانشگاهی (sid)، مگ ایران (magiran)، نورمگز (noormags) را بررسی و به ارائة برخی از مفاهیم نظری و نتایج پژوهش‌های انجام شده در این زمینه، به تشریح دلایل لزوم توجه بیشتر برنامه درسی ملی به کلاس‌های چندپایه و تدوین برنامه درسی خاص برای این کلاس‌ها پرداخته است. یافته‌ها بیانگر آن است که کلاس‌های چندپایه، یکی از جنبه‌های مغفول برنامه درسی ملی است و با توجه به وجود این کلاس‌ها در نظام آموزش رسمی کشور ما، ارائه ساختارها و پشتیبانی‌های لازم جهت آموزش کیفی در این شرایط، ضروری به نظر می‌رسد؛ بنابراین تدارک یک برنامه درسی بومی‌شده برای این کلاس‌ها یک ضرورت انکارناپذیر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Localized curriculum,undeniable necessity for multigrade classes

نویسندگان [English]

  • samane taherizade 1
  • rasoul shabany 2

1 Farhangian University, Shahid Bahonar Campus, Arak, Iran.

2 Department of Education of Delijan County, Delijan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The curriculum planning of multigrade classes is a challenging topic in advanced and developing countries. In these countries, curriculum planning of multigrade classes is considered to be essential in terms of necessity, efficiency and practicality. This review article is based on a library methodology and review articles that are based on databases such as Irandoc, sid, Magiran, Noormags and Googol Scholar was searched and by presenting some theoretical concepts and the results of research in this field, the reasons for the need to pay more attention to the national curriculum into multigrade classes and the formulation of a special curriculum for these classes has been explained. The paper studies concluded that multigrade classes are one of the neglected aspects of the national curriculum, and given the existence of these classes in our country's formal education system, it is necessary to provide the necessary structures and supports for qualitative education in these conditions. Therefore, the provision of a localized curriculum for these classes is an indispensable necessity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • localized curriculum
  • National Curriculum
  • neglected curriculum
  • multigrade class

Aikman, S. and el Haj, H. (2006). EFA for pastoralists in north Sudan: A mobile multigrade model of schooling. In. Little, A. W. (ed.). Education for all and multi-grade teaching: challenges and opportunities, Dordrecht, Pp. 193-211.

Aghazade, M. (2016). An applied guide to the new teaching methods. Tehran: Meraat. (Persian).

Aghazade, M; Fazli, R. (2005). The guide for teaching in multigrade classroom. Tehran: Ayiizh. (Persian).

Aghazade, M; Attaran, M; Farzad, V; Hajihoseinnejad, GH. (2007). Design and validate the model adaptation national curriculum for multigrade classroom. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol, 2, No,6, P 5. (Persian).

Aksoy,N(2008). Multigrade Schooling in Turkey: An Overview, International Journal of Educational Development, Vol 28(2), pp. 218-228.

Alikhani, M; Mehrmohammadi, M. (2005). Investigate unintended outcomes (hidden curriculum) caused by the social environment of Isfahan high schools and presenting strategies for reducing their negative effects. Journal of Training & Learning Researches. Vol, 12, No, 12, Pp 39-48.

Azizi, N; Hoseinpanahi, Kh. (2014). Compare the academic achievement of students in second grade elementary of multigrade classes with normal students in persian language skills. Journal of Training & Learning Researches. Vol, 20, No,3, Pp 179-194. (Persian).

Bashiriyehaddadan, G, Mahmoudi, F; Rezapour, Y; Adib, Y. (2016). Description of experiences And perceptions of teachers and experts from education in multigrade classes of primary school in Kaleybar of rural areas. Journal of Training & Learning Researches. Vol, 22, No, 7, Pp 107-120. (Persian).

Birch, I; Lali, M. (2000). Multigrade teaching in primary school. Translation: P, Jafari. Tehran: Farashenakhtiye Andishe.

Blum, N. and Diwan, R. (2007), Small, Multigrade Schools and Increasing Access to Primary Education in India, National Context and NGO Initiatives, CREATE PATHWAYS TO ACCESS, Research Monograph No17,CREATE: Brighton.

Berry, C. (2002), Multigrade Teaching, A Discussion Document, Paper Presented at Commonwealth Secretariat Multigrade Workshop, Gaberone, July 19-21.

Cornish, L(2006), Parents’ Views of Composite Classes in an Australian Primary School, The Australian Educational Researcher, Vol 33(2), pp. 123-142.

Dehbandi,z. (2010). Compare integration students' academic performance with multigrade classes in primary schools in the Mazandaran province and provide appropriate solutions to the proper authorities. Unpublished MA Thesis. (Persian).

Eisemon, T. (2000).Strategies to reduce the frequency of base. Translation: M, Hamidi. Tehran: Pajouheshkadeye Talim o Tarbiyat.

Eisner, Elliot(1998), Educational Imagination, On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs, Macmillan College Publishing, N. Y.

Emadzade, M. (1993). Discussion of the economic of education. Esfahan: Jahade dsneshgahi. (Persian).

Enayati, T; Zameni,F; Movahedian, M. (2016). Classroom Management Strategies of Multigrade Schools with Emphasis on the Role of Technology. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp 165-179.

Hajieshagh, S. (2004). Teaching-learning process in multigrade classes. Tehran: Kouroshchap. (Persian).

Hargreaves, E. (2001), Assessment for learning in multi-grade classroom, International Journal of Education Development, Vol 21(6), pp. 553-560.

Hussain, R. & Retallik, J. (2005), Teaching and learning in multi-grade classes, In. Retallik, J, and Farah, I. Transforming schools in Pakistan, towards the learning community, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Kadivar, P. et al. (2005), Effectiveness of Multi-Grade Classes, Cooperative Learning as a

 

Key Element of Success, Proceeding of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Volume 8 October. (Persian).

Khakzad, F; Dehghani, M; Razi,j. (2016). Comparison of implicit learning and academic achievement in multiple grade classes in primary schools. Journal of Applied Psychological Research Quarterly. 7(1), Pp 41-56. (Persian).

Komings, W; Daul, F. (1997). Improving the quality of primary education in transition countries. Translation: M, Moshtagh. Tehran: Aghigh.

Little, A.W. (2006),Education for All and Multigrade Teaching, Challenges and Opportunities, Dordrecht, Springer.

Little, W. A. (2005), Learning and teaching in multi-grade setting, paper prepared for the UNESCO 2005 EFA Monitoring Report, Accessed November, 19, 2007 at: http//unesco.org/images/0014/001466/14666 5e.pdf.

Lockheed, M; Verspoor, A. (1992). Quantitative expansion and qualitative improvement of primary education in developing countries. Translation: S.J, sajjadiye; H, Mohammadalizade Henji. Tehran: Madrese.

Madadiyeemamzade, Z; Kadivar, P; Navvabinejad, Sh. (2004). Investigate and compare social skills, self-esteem and academic achievement between students of multigrade and single base classes (primary schools). Journal of Research on issues of education. No 1-2, Pp 27-44. (Persian).

Mehrmohammadi, M & et al. (2008). Curriculum Theories, Approaches and  Perspectives. Tehran: Samt. (Persian).

Ministry of Education of Islamic Republic of Iran. (2011). Fundamental Reform Document of Education. Supreme Council of Education. (Persian).

Ministry of Education of Islamic Republic of Iran. (2012). National Curriculum. Supreme Council of Education. (Persian).

Mkosana, C; Kapesa, M. (2007).Multigrade teaching: introdution to multigrade teaching. Translation: M, Aghazade. Tehran: Ayiizh.

Mortazavizade, H & et al. (2018). Analyze teachers' views on executive problems Descriptive qualitative evaluation plan in Multigrade classrooms and provide solutions to solve them. Research in Curriculum Planning. 15(30): 80-93. (Persian)

Naylor, C. (2000), Split-Grade and Multi-Age classes, a review of the research and consideration of the B.C. Context, Accessed, January, 15, 2008 at:http://bctf.ca/publications/ResearchReports.a spx?id=5560.

Pridmore, P. & Son Vu, W. T. (2006), Adapting the Curriculum for Teaching Health in multigrade Classes in Vietnam, In. Little, A. W. (ed.). Education for all and multigrade teaching, challenges and opportunities, Dordrecht, Pp. 169-191.

Raouferezaee, R. (2007). Planning, teaching and managing multi-grade classes. Tehran: Iran. (Persian).

Reese, D. (1998), Mixed-age grouping:What does the research say, and how can parents use this information? Parent News Archive, Vol 5, pp. 1-4.

Samadiyan, S. (2006). Method of organizing and teaching multigrade classes. Tehran: Moallef. (Persian).

Shel, T. A. (2007), Gender and Inequity in Education, Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report, Paris, UNESCO.

Soleymani, N; Haddadian, A; Shahrabi, K. (2010). Investigate and compare academic achievement and social skills of students of multigrade and normal classes in elementary schools. Quarterly journal of educational leadership & administration. Vol, 4, No,4, Pp 129-144. (Persian).

Vincent, S. (ed). (1999), The Multi-grade Classroom, A Resource Hanbook for Small, Rural Schools, Book 1, Review of Research on Multi-grade Instruction, Portland, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Wallace, J.S; Masvet, G.B. (2005). Handbook for multigrade teachers. Translation: A, Zarafshan. Tehran: Madrese.