نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه مدیریت، واحد پارس‌آباد مغان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، پارس‌آباد مغان، ایران.

10.30486/jsre.2020.575729.1249

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، طراحی الگوی اثربخش کیفیت آموزش در واحدهای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است. حوزه پژوهش در مرحلۀ اول تحقیق (رویکرد کیفی) 24 نفر از خبرگان حوزه آموزش بودند که به‌صورت هدفمند و با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری گلوله برفی انتخاب شدند. در مرحلۀ دوم (رویکرد کمی)، اساتید و کارشناسان آموزش دانشگاه‌ آزاد اسلامی شمال غرب ایران بودند که بر اساس جدول گرجسی و مورگان 196 نفر با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی انتخاب شدند. روایی پرسشنامه‌ با استفاده از روایی محتوا تأیید و میزان پایایی نیز توسط آلفای کرونباخ 89/. محاسبه و تأیید شد. داده‌های تحقیق با استفاده از مدل معادلات ساختاری به روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مرتبة سوم به کمک نرم‌افزارهای آماری SPSS و PLS، تحلیل شدند. یافته‌های حاصل از پژوهش کیفی در 3 بعد اصلی (عوامل مربوط به دانشجو، استاد و محیط)، 6 مؤلفه و 42 شاخص دسته‌بندی شدند. در مرحلة کمی نیز عوامل مربوط به استاد با ضریب تأثیر 90/0 اثرگذارترین مؤلفه‌ها را دارد و بعد از آن، عوامل مربوط به محیط با ضریب تأثیر 84/0 و عوامل مربوط به دانشجو با ضریب تأثیر 79/0 در رتبه‌های بعدی قرار گرفتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and explaining the effective model of education quality in units of Islamic Azad University of Northwest Iran (By combination method)

نویسنده [English]

  • kheyrollah Sarboland

Department of Management, Parsabad Moghan Branch,Islamic Azad University, Parsabad Moghan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to design and explain the effective model of education quality in units of Islamic Azad University. The research population in the first stage (qualitative approach) was 24 educational experts who were selected using purposive sampling method. In the second stage (quantitative approach), the teachers and experts of Islamic Azad University of Northwest Iran were selected by random sampling according to Grigs and Morgan table 196 people were selected by random sampling method. Validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by content validity Cronbach's alpha reliability was 0.89. The research data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling by third-order confirmatory factor analysis with SPSS and PLS statistical software. The qualitative findings of the study indicated that the conceptual model fitted well and in the quantitative stage also the factors related to the master have the most effective factor of 0.90. And after that, environmental factors with a factor of 0.84 and student factors with a factor of 0.79 were ranked next.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Quality
  • education
  • Higher Education
  • Islamic Azad University
  • Northwest Iran

Abdi, A. (2019). The flipped classroom: Instructional efficiency and impact on Students' Perceived Cognitive load and Academic Performance (Case Study: The Information Technology Course in Psychology, Payame Noor University. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 13(45), 45-58, [Persian].

Abedi, R. & Mahdavian, Sh. (2015). Investigate the situation using information technologyin elementary PE teachers International. Journal of Sport Studies, 5(9), 108-109, [Persian].

 

Atashrouz, M., Mohammad Pourmoghadasian, A., & Marashi, S. M. (2018). Investigating the Teaching Quality of Faculty Members from the Perspective of Students; the Case of Branches of Farhangian University in Khuzestan Province. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 8(23), 49-72, [Persian].

Amozad, M., Ghahremani, M., Khorasani, A., & Farashkhah, M. (2017). Investigating the system of personnel training and development in Iranian organizations (study of existing situation) quarterly. Journal of Human Resource Education and Development, Second, 7(11), 25-37, [Persian].

Bazargan, A. (2011). Educational Evaluation: Concepts, Patterns and Operational Processes, Tehran, Sadegh, [Persian].

Becket, N., & Brooks, M. (2008). Quality management in higher education: what quality are we actually enhancing? Journal of hospitality, Leisure, Sport & tourism education, 7(1), 89-101.

Carnevalli, A., & Miguel, P. (2008). Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD-Types ofresearch, difficulties and benefits, Production Economics, 114, 737-754.

Dadres, M., Kharan, Z., Yousefi, R., Farajideh, M., & Sorkhi, H. (2016). Assessing the quality of university services from the perspective of students: comparing engineering faculties of a comprehensive university and an industrial university in Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Education, Nineteenth, 7)4), 149-127, [Persian].

Gamalizarah, B., Nasr, A. R., & Shadfar, H. (2013 Models of Quality Assessment in Higher Education Based on the Needs of Customers. Higher Education Letter, 6(22), 7-23, [Persian].

Hadi, R., Rezapur, Y., & Solmanpour, S. (2016). Indicators of Higher Education Quality Based on the Kano Model in Urmia University. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(34), 35-50, [Persian].

Hoseini, A., karimiyan, N., Hesami, F., & Mohammadi, B. (2019). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on achivement emotions of elementary students in Science course. Biannual Peer Review Journal of Training & Learning Reasearches, 16(1), 41-50, [Persian].

Esmaeilnia, M., Kouhestani, H., & Maghool, A. (2019). Design and validation of quality improvement model of virtual learning in Farhangian University (mixed method). Journal of Technology of Education, 13(3), 561-580, [Persian].

Farahani, A., Hosseini, M., & Ghareh, M. A. (2013). The pattern of quality assurance of physical science in distance learning system. Applied Research of Sport Management, 2(2), 119-135, [Persian].

Karimian, H. (2011). Internal Evaluation Appropriate Approach to Improve the Quality of the Higher Education System, Quarterly Journal of Educational Strategies, 1(2), 89-77, [Persian].

Khorasani, A., Abbaspour, A., & Vafayizadeh, M. (2015). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Transfer of Education in In-Service Education among Non-faculty Members of Tehran University Using Holton Model. Quarterly Journal of Human Resource Education and Development, 2(5), 1-25, [Persian].

Li chia, Y. (2010). Accreditation and quality assurance of higher education in Switzerland, Europe. Centre for socio-economic development.

Mizikaci, f. (2006). A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 14, 37-53.

Movahedi, R., Sherkhani, M., & Talebi, B. (2017). The Study of Effective Factors on Improving the Quality of Education: Case Study in College of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina Universty. Higher Education Letter. 10(37), 79-110, [Persian].

Motahharinejad, H., Ghourchian, N., Jafari, P., & Yaghoubi, M. (2016). Quality assurance standards of engineering education in Iran: a global approach. Iranian Journal of Engineering Engineering, 17(54), 21-42, [Persian].

Piri, M., Mesrabadi, J., & Azizi, H. (2017). The Effectiveness of Concept Map Based Instruction on Concept Retention and Comperhension in Science and Social Lessons in the Elementry Sixth Grade). Research in Curriculum Planning, 14(55), 91-99, [Persian].

Scott, P. (2010). UK Higher education in twenty first century; a changing picture, quality matters Series, London, QAA.

Shekarbaghani, A. (2018). Study the effectiveness of the curriculum content of Bachelor and Master Degree courses on community their job needs (Case Study: Applied Physics syllabus content). Research in Curriculum Planning, 14(59), 94-108, [Persian].

Shekari, A., Mohammadi Khoshouie, Z., & Mohammadi, B. (2017). The Effect of New Educational Technologies on the Quality of Educational Activities of Teachers. Research in Curriculum Planning, 13(25), 74-83, [Persian].

Soare, E. (2015). Perspectives on Designing the Competence Based Curriculum. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 972-977.

Torkzadeh, J., & Nekoumand, S. (2015). Validating the Scale of University's Power of Response to Environment. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 5, 241-252.

Torkzadeh, J., Marzooghi, R., Mohammadi, M., Salimi, G., & Keshavarzi, F. (2017). Developing an effectiveness evaluation framework in higher education curricula: A strategic approach. Academic Journal of Curriculum Research, 6(2), 41-64.

Voss R., Gruber, T., & Szmigin I. (2007). Service quality in higher education: The role of student expectations, Journal of Business Research, 60, 949-959.

Wood house, D. (2003). Quality Improvement through Quality Audit Quality in Higher Educationg, 5(2) 133-140.