نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران.

3 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

4 دانشیار فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت دانشگاه شاهد تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی الگوی تدریس خلاق مبتنی بر مؤلفه‌های معرفت‌شناختی ژیل دلوز و فیلیکس گاتاری به روش تحلیل مفهومی و نیز استنتاجی و با استفاده از مطالعۀ منابع مرتبط با اندیشه‌های دلوز و گاتاری انجام شده است. بر مبنای تحلیل مفهومی، مؤلفه‌های معرفت‌شناختی دلوز و گاتاری شامل؛ اتصال و ناهمگونی، کثرت، گسست نادلالت‌گر، نقشه‌نگاری، فولدینگ و درون‌بودگی می‌باشند. بر این اساس الگوی تدریس خلاق با بهره‌گیری از معرفت‌شناختی دلوز و گاتاری در قالب عناصری چون؛ معلم به‌عنوان راهنما، تسهیل گر، همکار و عامل تغییر، دانش‌آموز به‌عنوان محقق، کوچ‌گر، خلاق، مشارکت‌جو، پرسشگر و نقاد، اهداف متأثر از تفکر افقی و واگرا، یادگیری مبتنی بر مدل‌های یادگیری فعال، مشارکتی، کارآموزی، خدمات‌رسانی، فعالیت‌های یادگیری مبتنی بر تولید اندیشه‌های خلاق، محتوا مبتنی بر ویژگی کثرت‌گرایی، بین‌رشته‌ای، تداخل و درهم‌تنیدگی دیسیپلین‌ها و غیره طراحی شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing creative teaching pattern based on Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari’s epistemological components

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Abdolahyar 1
  • mahdi sobhaninejad 2
  • seyedmahdi sajadi 3
  • Mohsen Farmahini 4

1 PhD in Philosophy of Education, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor Department of Educational Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

This study was conducted to design creative teaching pattern based on Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari’s epistemological components by using conceptual and inference methodologies & studying related documents. Based on conceptual analysis, the epistemological components of Deleuze and Guattari include connection and heterogeneity, plurality, asignfying rupture, folding and immanence. Accordingly, the creative teaching model using Deleuze and Guattari’s epistemology in the form of elements such as;teacher as a guide, facilitator,teammate and change agent, student as a researcher, nomd ,creative, participatory, critique; goals which are affected by horizontal and divergent thinking; learning based on active and participatory models, apprenticeship, service learning; learning activities based on generative and creative thinking; contents based on pluralism features based on interdisciplinary of interference and interconnectedness of disciplines has been designed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Creative teaching
  • teaching-learning model
  • Epistemology
  • Deleuze and Guattari’s model
Abdolahyar, A. (2019). Desgining and validating the creative teaching pattern based on Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s epistemological views (Unpublished master's thesis), Shahed University. [Persian]
Abdoli, A., Mirshah J. A., Liyaghatdar, M., Zaynoddinimeymand, F. (2016). Pathology of teaching methods in the learning process from the viewpoint of teachers and students of high schools in Isfahan. Research in Curriculum Planning, 12(20),117-132. [Persian]
Avalos, B. M. & Winslade, J. (2010). Education as a “line of flight” Explorations: An E-Journal of Narrative Practice, 1(1), 70–77.
Bissola, R., Imperatory, B., Biffi, A. (2017). A rhizomatic learning process to create collective knowledge in entrepreneurship education: innovation beyond boundaries, Management Learning: 48(2),206-226.
Charney, R. (2017). Rhizomatic Learning and Adapting (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Antioch, Ohio.
Clarke, B. and Parsons, J. (2013). Becoming Rhizome Researchers, Reconceptualizing, Educational Research Methodology, 4(1). 35-43.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987/2002). A Thousand plateaus: capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.
Deleuze, G. (1993). The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy. New York: Columbia University press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (R.
 
Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.
Deleuze G.& Guattari F. (1986). Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.
Imanzadeh, A. (2008). Investigating the Basics and Educational Consequences of Gilles Deleuze's Epistemological View and Its Criticism Based on Sadra's Epistemology (Unpublished master's thesis), Tarbiat Modares University. [Persian]
Jones, A. and Bennett, R. (2016). Reaching beyond an online/offline divide: invoking the rhizome in higher education course design, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2):193-210.
Khosroshiri, M.A. (2011). The Study of the Effect of the Pattern of Conceptual Change of Physics on the Learning of the Concept of Work and Energy (Unpublished master's thesis). Shahid Rajaee University. [Persian]
Martin. D. (2018). Professional identities and pedagogical practices. USA: New Jersey City University Press.
Mashayekhi, A. (2014). The logic of the evolution of time in difference and repetition, Mah and Philosophy, 17(81), 62-50. [Persian]
Padarand, N. (2013). The Effect of Teaching Philosophy on Children on Creativity (Unpublished master's thesis). Faculty of psychology and educational sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch. [Persian]
Rahimi, Z. (2009). The philosophical explanation of information and communication technology for education and its critique based on Derrida’s deconstruction theory (Unpublished master's thesis). Tarbiat Modarres University. [Persian]
Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
Sajjadi S.M. and Imanzadeh, A. (2012). Critical analysis of educational implications of Deluze’s perspective on epistemology. New thought of education, 8(4),50-53. [Persian]
Sajjadi S.M., Farmahini, M., Ahmadihedayat, H. & Ahmadabadi, N. (2018). Explaining epistemology of Gilles Deleuze and Allameh Tabatabai and criticizing the challenges of the rhizomatic approach, The Knowledge Studies in The Islamic University, 22(75),203-226. [Persian]
Semetsky, I. & Masny, D. (2013). Deleuze and Education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Tillmanns, T. (2014). Interplay of rhizome and education for sustainable development, Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2). 5-17.
Vasilopoulos, G. (2016). A Critical review of international students’ adjustment research from a Deleuzian perspective, Journal of International Students,6(1), 283-307.
Wallin, J., (2010). A Deleuzian Approach to Curriculum. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.