نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران، ‌ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، پژوهشگاه مطالعات آموزش و پرورش تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، طراحی الگوی عوامل مؤثر بر فعالیت‌های خلاقانه دانش‌آموزان دوره اول متوسطه در درس ریاضی است. این پژوهش از نوع کیفی و روش آن سنتزپژوهی است. بدین منظور برای بررسی پیشینه پژوهش و جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، متناسب با هدف پژوهش از منابع موجود در طرح‌های پژوهشی، مقالات، پایان‌نامه‌ها در پایگاه‌های تخصصی و علمی داخل (از سال 1388-1399)و خارج از کشور(از سال‌های 2000 تا 2020) استفاده شد. واژگان مورد استفاده خلاقیت ریاضی، فعالیت‌های خلاقانه بود. براساس معیار ورود 82 پژوهش شناسایی و سپس با توجه به معیار خروج 44 پژوهش کنار گذاشته و در نهایت 38 پژوهش برای تحلیل نهایی انتخاب شدند. براساس یافته‌های حاصل از تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها 5 درون‌مایه و21 طبقه استخراج شدند که عبارتند از: معلم با 5 طبقه، برنامه‌‌درسی و آموزش با 4 طبقه، محیط اجتماعی و فرهنگی با 3 طبقه، فراگیر با 5 طبقه و محیط اجرا با 4 طبقه. سیاست‌گذاران نظام‌های آموزشی می‌توانند با استفاده از الگوی طراحی شده، تدابیر و برنامه شایسته‌ای را در جهت پرورش خلاقیت ریاضی برای دانش‌آموزان اتخاذ نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a model of effective factors on creative activities of students first grade of high school in Mathematics lesson’

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir hossein Dashteh 1
  • Mohammad Nourian 2
  • Morteza Samiei Zafarghandi 3

1 PhD. Student in curriculum planning, Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch, Iran

2 - Associate professor, group of educational sciences and psychology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch, Iran

3 - Associate professor, group of educational sciences and psychology, educational center for studies of education system, Tehran-Iran

چکیده [English]

The aim this study is designing a model of effective factors on creative activities of students first grade of high school in mathematics lesson. The present study is of qualitative type and its method is synthetic research. The resources available in research projects, articles, dissertations in specialized and scientific databases inside(from 1388 to1399) and outside the country (from 2000 to 2020). Were used for this purpose and to review the research background and collect data in a manner appropriate to the purpose of the research. Vocabulary used included mathematical creativity, and creative activities. Based on the inclusion criteria, 82 studies were identified and then according to the exclusion criteria, 44 studies were excluded and finally 38 studies were selected for the final analysis. Based on the findings of data analysis, 5 themes and 21 categories were extracted, which are: Teacher with 5 categories, curriculum and education with 4 categories, social and cultural environment with 3 categories, inclusive with 5 categories and performance environment with 4 categories. Policy makers of educational systems can use the designed model to take appropriate measures and programs to adopt mathematical creativity for students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mathematical creativity
  • Designing a model
  • creative activities
-Afshar Kohan Z., Maleki H., Mehr Mahmoodi M. (2016). Impact of mathematical syllabus mixed with satire on mathematical creativity in students. Doctoral dissertation, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences.
-Amini M., Montazer M., Rahimi H. (2019). Diagnostics of creativity growth in students at Iranian educational system: Kashan high schools (Primary Course), Scientific Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities. 9 (1). 81-114.
-Amraei F., Ghadampoor A., Sharifi T. (2019). Comparison of thinking expansion and self-regulated learning strategies on creativity of students, Scientific Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities. 8 (4). 97-128.
-Arikan, E, E (2014). Is there relations p between creativity and mathematical creativity? Journal of Education and learning. 6(4). 239.
-Arvahi M. (2013). Review of effective factors in training of creativity among primary school students from perspective of primary school teachers at four regions in Karaj City. MA thesis. Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch.
-Askari Robati, G; Khalili Klaki, Z (2020) Content Analysis of the Seventh Grade Math Book with William Rowley Technique, Guilford Creativity Factors, and Anderson Cognitive Domain, Pooyesh Quarterly in Basic Science Education. 6 (21).
 
-Azemati H., Parvizi R., Karimi A., Aghabeigi M. (2016). Effective designing principles in enhancement of creativity in students within educational setting, Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities, 6 (2). 121-142.
-Bahramipoor M., Abedi A., Faramarzi S., Malekpoor M. (2018). Finding of a model for prediction of mathematical talent based on variables of creativity and character type in talented students of primary schools. Journal of knowledge and research in applied psychology. 19 (3). 1-13.
-Bahar, A, K & Maker, c,J (2011). Exploring the relationship between, Asia- pacific Journal of gifted and Talented Education, 3(1). 33-48.
-Bakar, M, N & Norman, I (2012). The role of metacognitive Abilities in Posing   mathematical problem. Journal of science and mathematics Education, 5, 1-10.
-Beghetto, R, A (2007). Does Creativity have a place in classroom discussion? Prospective teacher's response preferences. Thinking skill and creativity. 2(11). 1-9
-Bidgoli Z., Noroozi D., Maghami H. (2018). Impact of smartening technologies of schools on creativity of students. Quarterly of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities. 7 (4). 241-262.
-Borba,M,C&Villareal,M,E(2005).Human with media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking .Information and Communication Technologies ,modeling Experimentation and visualization ,Mathematics Education Library.
-Canaani S., Nourian M., Noroozi D., Abaei Kopaei M. (2017). Curricular model for teaching of philosophy to the children based on results of related studies. Scientific and Research Quarterly of thinking and child, Research center for humanities and cultural studies. 9 (2). 121-151.
-Colley, K. M(2015). Cultivating creativity. The practice of teaching for creativity in the elementary class room. A: valiable from dissertations & these @ university of Denver; pro Quest Dissertations & These Global (1701284845). Retrieved from https:// search pro guest com, du. Idm oclc. Org/ doc view 1701284845.
-Creswell,j,w (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative nd qualitative research. Library of congress cataloging in Publication Data.
-Cooper, H; Hedges, L, v; Jeffrecy, G,V(2009). The handbook of research synthesis and Analysis, second Edition , ZSBN; 972-0-2-7154-163-5.
-Daykin, N; McClean, S & Bunt,L (2009). Creativity, identity and healing: participant's accounts of music therapy in cancer cave. Health: 11 (3). 349-370.
-Dorbeheshti Z., Asareh A. (2016). Content analysis on newly published mathematics book of ninth grade based on Plesk teaching creativity model, MA thesis, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch, Faculty of psychology and educational sciences.
-Doron, E (2017). Fostering creativity in school aged children through perspective taking and visual media based term intervention program. Thinking skill and creativity, 23. 60-150.
-Eskandari M., Bahadoran H. (2018). Content analysis of mathematics book of grade 10 (high school secondary course) based on Gilford’s creativity model, Quarterly of innovation and creativity in humanities. 8 (1). 143-164.
-Farhadi pour, M.; Abbasi, AS; Karim zaei, S. (2015). Comparison of the effectiveness of inductive thinking teaching method and exploratory teaching method on the creativity of fifth grade elementary students. Dars Journal of Research in Planning 12 (2). 10-21
-Ghasemi A., Asareh A. (2014). Content analysis of mathematical textbooks of fourth and fifth grades of primary school based on Plesk creativity teaching model, Quarterly of studies on Iranian curricula. 9 (34). 93-116.
-Goldin, G(2017) . Mathematical creativity and giftedness. Perspective in response. ZD.M Mathematics Education. Rutgers university. New Bruna sick. USA.
-Gralewski, J (2019). Teacher's beliefs about creative student's characteristics: A qualitative study. Thinking Skills and creativity, 31, 138-155.
-Gregoire, j (2016). Understands creativity in mathematics for improving mathematical education journal of cognitive education and psychology. 15(1). 34-36.
-GU, J; Zhang, Y; liu, H (2014). Importance of social capital to student's creativity within higher education in china. Thinking skill and creativity,, 12, 14-25.
-Hansen, J, B. & Feldhusen, J, F( 1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted child quarterly, 38(3). 115-121 .
-Henriksen, D & Mehta, R (2016) A Beautiful Mindset: creative teaching practices mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education. 9 (2). 81-89.
-Heize, A & Riss, K (2006). Learning to prove with heuristic worked- out examples. Proceeding of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Vol 3. July. 16-21.
-Henssey, G, A & Amabile, T.M (2010). Creativity annual review of psychology, 61, 569-598.
-Hoth, J; kaiser, G: Busse, A (2017). Professional competences of teachers for fostering creativity and supporting high-achieving students. ZDM mathematics Education. Doi: 10. 1007/s//858-ol6-0817-5.
- Horng, J, S., Hong, J, C., Chanlin, L, J & Chu, H, C (2005) creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International journal of consumer studies, 29 (4). 352 – 358.
-Houtz, J, C (2003). The educational psychology of creativity. Cresskill n. J Hampton press. Inc. pp 3-24.
- Kafman, J, C & sternberg, R, J (2006). The international handbook of creativity.
-Jafri F. (2012). Effective factors on learners’ questions in classroom, Month Book of Social Sciences, 16 (55). 101-104.
-Jebeli Adeh, p; Sobhani, A. (2012). The effect of using creative teaching methods on the creativity of fourth grade elementary students in Golestan province. Scientific Journal of Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities 2 (2).
- Kandemir M. A. & Gur. H. (2009) The use of creative problem solving scenarios in mathematics education views of some prospective Teachers. Procedia so coal and Behavioral sciences. 1; 1628-1635.
 -Karwowski, M. & Lebuda, I (2016). The five, the huge TW. And creative self beliefs. A meta- analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, creativity and the Art, 10(2), 214-232 .
-Kazazi, Z; Ebrahimi, S.; Seifi, A.; Isfahani Zadeh, A. (2020). Relationship between teachers' creativity and the effectiveness of sixth grade math teaching. Pooyesh Quarterly in Basic Science Education. 6 (20).
-Khalilinejad,A.ShahvaraniA.,Mardanbeigi M. (2015). Analysis of effect of elimination of creative barriers on rate of creativity growth among students in Mathematics lesson, 2nd International Conference on Research in Sciences and Technology, Turkey, Istanbul.
-Khodabandeh F., Reyhani A., Hamidi F. (2019). Review of performance of students of eighth grade in giving answers to close- and open-ended mathematical questions and measurement of creativity of students, MA thesis in the field of mathematical education, Shahid Rajaei Teacher Training University.
-Kiymaz, Y; sriraman, B & lee k. 14(2012). Prospective secondary mathematics teacher's mathematical creativity in problem solving the Elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics, 173-191.
-Kontorovich, I; Koichu, B; Leikin, R (2011). Indicators of creativity in mathematical problem posing: How indicative ore thy? In proceeding of the 6th international conference on creativity in mathematics education and education of the gifted students. University: latvia. Bulgaria 120-125.
-Koolaeinejad G., Jafri Nodooshan S. (2013). Effectiveness of directed exploratory method in mathematics on creativity of female students at third grade of primary school. Scientific and Research Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities, 3 (3). 
-Kozlowski, J, S & Chamberlin, S, A (2019). Factors that influence mathematical creativity: the mathematics enthusiast. 16(1).
-Maan, E.L (2009). The search for mathematical creativity: Identify potential in middle school student. Creative research Journal, 21 (4). 338-348.
-Maleki H. (2018). Rudiments of curricular planning. Tehran: SAMT Pub.
-McCoy. J. M & Evans, G, W (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity creativity Research Journal. 14(3), 409-426.
-Mehdizadeh A. Kiani F., Khodabakhsh M. Fooladvand KH. (2013). Efficacy of teaching model based on training of mathematical creativity on mathematic performance of female students. Quarterly of leadership and teaching leadership. 7 (1). 139-154.
- Mina, F (2008). Promoting creativity for all students in mathematics education. Proceeding of the discussing group 9: in the 11 the ICME (Monterrey, Mexico, 2008)
-Miller, A, L., Lambert, A, D & Speirs Neumister, K, L (2012). Parenting style, Perfectionism, and creativity in high – ability and high – achieving young adults. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 35 (4), 344 – 365.
-Mirzaei F., Baezat F. Ghaffari M. (2018). Effectiveness of creative problem solving based teaching model on cognitive approach toward mathematic problem-solving and motivation and attitude to creativity of students, MA thesis in the field of educational psychology. University of Mazandaran, Department of Human and Social Sciences.
-Morais, M, F & Azevedo, I (2011). What is a creative Teacher and what is a creative pupil? Perceptions of Teachers. Procedia- social and Behavioral science, 12, 330-339.
-Movahedi Y. (2019). Effect of optimal design of educational setting for improvement of creativity, Journal of educational technology, 13 (3), 523-529.
-Naderi Bovanloo S. Reyhani A., Yaftian N. (2014). Analysis on ability of problem expression by students. MA thesis, Shahid Rajaei Teacher Training University, Department of Basic Sciences.
Nadjafikhah,M;Yaftian,N;Bakhshalizadeh, S (2012). Mathematical creativity: some definitions and characteristics. Procedia social and Behavioral sciences. 285-291.
-Najafikhah M., Yaftian N. (2011). The outlook of creativity in mathematical teaching process. Scientific and Research Journal of teaching technology. 5 (4). 251-264.
-Neumann, C, J (2007). Fostering creativity= A model for developing a  culture of collective creativity in science Embo., Report, 8(3). 202-206.
-Nourian M. (2017). Analysis of syllabi in Iranian primary schools. Tehran: Gooyesh No Pub.
-Nourian M. Ezazi M., Khosravi Babadi A., Noroozi D. (2018). Research synthesis in comparative studies of teacher training systems in Iran and the world. Two volumes of Quarterly of theory and practice in syllabus, 6 (11). 67-104.
-Payastasious. C (2002). School teaching and family influence on student attitude to ward science: Based on times data studies in Educational Evaluation. 28. 71-86.
-pioncare, H (2012). The foundation of science. Benediction classics. (original work Published in 1913
-Radbakhsh N., Mehdi Forookian Erthi F. (2013). Effectiveness of game and story-telling on rising creativity. Quarterly of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities. 2 (4). 177-195.
-Rahimimand M., Abbaspoor A. (2015). Impact of modern teaching method on creativity and academic achievement of students. Scientific Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities, 4 (4). 119-142.
-Ranjbar, F; Fadaei, M; Rafi pour, A. (2020). Determining the level of creativity in junior high school math textbooks. Master Thesis in Mathematics Education, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman.
-Salehi, M.; Hosseini, Z; Nazok Tabar, H. (2019). The effect of family performance and students' intelligence and creativity beliefs. Scientific Journal of Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities 9 (1). 211-230
-Savic, M (2012). What do mathematicians do when they have a proving impasse? In proceeding of the conference on Research in undergraduate mathematics Education.
-Seif A. (2017). Modern educational psychology. Psychology of learning and teaching, Tehran: Doran Pub. Simonton, D, K (2012). Teaching creativity. Current finding tends, and controversies in the psychology of creativity. Teaching of psychology, 39(3). 217-222.
-Seif Derakhshandeh S., Narimani M. (2019). Meta-analysis on factors and barriers relating to rising creativity in students. Journal of school psychology, 8 (3). 102-103.
-Sinitsky,I(2008).Both for teacher and for students. on some essential  features of creativity-stimulating activities. proceedings of the 11th International congress on Mathematical Education Monterrey .Mexico
-Shabani M. Maleki H., Abbaspoor A., Saadipoor A. (2018). Design of a curricular model based on creativity in organizational university, Journal of study in curricular planning, 31 (2), 62-78.
-Shams, Sh; Hashemi Moghadam, S; Sajjadinejad, M. (2020). The effect of imagination-based education on self-efficacy and academic engagement of female high school students. Master Thesis, Arak University.
-Starko, A.J (2018). Creativity in the classroom; schools of curious delight. New York: Routledge.
-Strenberg, R, J (2006). The nature of creativity Research Journal. 18(1)- 87-98.
-Srriaman, B., & Haavold, p(2017). Creativity and giftedness in mathematics education. A pragmatic view. First compendium for research in mathematics education. Reston National council of Teachers of mathematics.
-Sriraman, B (2008). Mathematical gifted ness, problem solving and the ability to formulate generalization. Creativity, giftedness, and talent development in mathematics, 4-33.
-Vale, J, Barb.sa, A (2015). Mathematics creativity in Elementary Teacher Training. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 10, 101-109.
-Warwick, J (2009). An experiment relating humor to student a attainment in mathematics. PRIMUS, 19 (4)- 329-345.
-Wessel, H, M (2014). Levels of mathematical creativity in model – eliciting activities Journal of mathematical Modelling and Application 1 (9) 22 – 40.
 
- Wu, H, Y; wu, H.S 8 Chen, I, S; chen, H, c(2014). Exploring the critical influential factors of creativity for college students. Thinking skill and creativity, 11, 1-21.
-Yaftian N. (2016). A review of creativity by focusing on mathematics. Journal of mathematics teaching growth. 34 (1).
-Yaftian N. (2017). The effective conditions and strategies for purposing creative solutions in solving of mathematical problems based on attitude of creative students of bachelor’s course of study. Journal of modern teaching approaches, 12 (2). 60-76.   
-Yazarloo A. (2013). Teacher’s role in training of creativity in students at high school based on attitude of teachers and students, MA hesis,Allameh Tabatabaei University.
-Yasami S., Hosseinikhah A., Kian M., Geramipoor M., Hosseini A. (2020). Design of creative school model for primary school and validation of that model based on viewpoint of experts. Scientific Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities, 10 (2). 171-208.
-Yuan, X, sriraman, B (2012). An exploratory study of relationships between student's creativity and mathematical problem posing abilities. The element of creativity and giftedness in mathematics, 5-28.